Theological Theses · §29

How we know the miracles happened: writers known; either deceived or deceiving

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

But you will say: those miracles are indeed said to have been done, yet how can we know they really were done? For it seems no less uncertain whether those miracles are true than whether that Scripture is divine in whose confirmation they are said to have been done. I answer that those things really happened can be proved efficaciously from our scriptures themselves. For our writers wrote those things in such a manner that they cannot have lied in this matter. For the one denying or doubting that what our writers Moses and Paul narrate about those miracles is true, I will ask, for example, whether he wills to call into doubt that there was a certain Moses who gave laws to the Israelite people and wrote certain volumes; and likewise that there was a certain Paul who preached Christian doctrine and wrote certain epistles ascribed to him. About this matter certainly no one has hitherto doubted, nor have the atheists themselves willed or dared to deny it. And really that is witnessed by a fame so constant, so perennial, so received by the consent of all — even of adversaries — that to doubt about this would plainly be to rave. For frequent mention of Moses and of his writings is made among the Gentiles. Nor do Jews and Muhammadans, most hostile enemies of the Christian religion, deny or doubt that our Apostles were and wrote. If someone would stubbornly wish to call that into doubt, he would have to be driven to bring a cause of his doubt, and some reason why he does not give faith to the concordant testimony of the whole world — and why he believes rather that Pliny and Titus Livius were and wrote than Moses and Paul. And certainly we labor in vain in proving this, since the matter is in confession. For those who reject God's word do not deny that those authors whom we hold as sacred were or wrote, but blaspheme that they did not write true things.

Come then, let us see whether it can be that those things narrated by Moses and Paul about those miracles are not true. Certainly, if they are not true, either those men were deceived in writing, thinking things had happened which really had not; or they wrote with a mind to deceive and tried to thrust false things for true. The former cannot be said. For they do not report those things as received from elsewhere, but testify them as done or seen by themselves. Therefore Moses must have willed to deceive the Israelites, and Paul the Corinthians, Galatians, and others. And so profane men feel who accuse Moses and Paul of imposture. It remains to see whether they were impostors who tried to persuade those to whom they were writing, and into whose hands they were handing their writings, that these and those prodigies and miracles had been done, when nevertheless nothing of them had been done.

Latin

XVII. At inquies, miracula illa facta quidem dicuntur, sed qui scire possumus illa revera facta esse: Nec enim minus incertum videtur, an vera sint illa miracula, quam hoc, an divina sit Scriptura illa in cujus confirmationem facta esse dicuntur. Respondeo. Quod ista revera contigerint, ex ipsis scripturis nostris efficaciter probari posse. Etenim scriptores nostri ista eo modo scripserunt, ut fieri non possit eos hac in re mentitos esse. Negantem enim, sive dubitantem vera esse quae narrant de miraculis istis scriptores nostri, Moses et Paulus, verbi causa, rogabo num velit in dubium vocare Mosen quendam fuisse qui Israelitico populo leges dedit, et quaedam volumina scripsit: Et similiter fuisse quendam Paulum, qui Christianam doctrinam praedicavit, et scripsit quasdam epistolas quae ipsi ascribuntur. Hac de re certe nemo hactenus dubitavit, nec ipsi quidem Athei hoc negare voluerunt, vel ausi fuerunt. Et revera id testatur fama tam constans, tam perennis, ita omnium, etiam adversariorum, consensu recepta, ut de hoc dubitare, delirare plane esset. Crebra enim Mosis et scriptorum ejus mentio fit apud Ethnicos. Neque Judaei et Mahumetani religionis Christianae hostes infestissimi, Apostolos nostros fuisse et scripsisse negant, sive dubitant. Quod si quis illud vellet pertinaciter in dubium vocare, eo adigendus esset, ut dubitationis suae causam afferret, et rationem aliquam cur fidem non habeat concordi totius orbis testimonio. Et cur credat potius Plinium, et Titum Livium fuisse et scripsisse, quam Mosen atque Paulum. Et certe frustra in hoc probando laboramus, quandoquidem res est in confesso. Neque enim illi, qui verbum Dei rejiciunt, negant authores illos, quos pro sacris habemus, fuisse vel scripsisse, sed illos vera non scripsisse blasphemant. XVIII. Age ergo videamus an fieri possit, ut vera non sint ea quae de miraculis istis a Mose et Paulo narrantur. Certe, si vera non sunt, aut decepti sunt illi in scribendo, existimantes contigisse ea, quae revera non contigerant: aut scripserunt animo fallendi, et conati sunt falsa pro veris obtrudere. Prius dici non potest. Non enim illa tanquam aliunde accepta referunt, sed a seipsis gesta sive visa testantur. Oportet ergo ut voluerint fallere Moses Israelitas, et Paulus Corinthios, Galatas et alios. Et sic sentiunt homines profani qui Mosen et Paulum accusant imposturae. Videndum igitur an fuerint impostores, qui conati sint suadere iis ad quos scribebant, et in quorum manus sua scripta tradebant, haec et illa prodigia et miracula facta fuisse, cum tamen illorum nihil factum fuerit.

About this text

Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu - Sedan Theological Theses, newly rendered from the 1675 London Latin. Covers De Theologia through Angelorum & Hominum Sanctorum Cultu Romana I-LXXVII and Pars Secunda (Reformata) I-XL. Not the collected folio.

English follows locked Pitt Latin through Imaginum CLOSED + Sanctorum Cultu Romana CLOSED + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL. 1675 PDF ~384-390 (book ~370-376); Vision OCR + pdftotext + tess. No modern English. This slice densifies Sanctorum Pars Secunda I-XL. Next: Pars Secunda XLI–fin (~CI). Claim stays claimed (book densify not done).

Catalogue & scope

ESTC R17887; Wing L802. IA bub_gb_eOkHAW4G0-wC (+ EEBO 1675 for gap leaves). Densify through Sanctorum Cultu Romana I-LXXVII + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL (Pars Secunda not closed; not whole folio).

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.