Theological Theses · §23

The first transmitters prove Scripture divine: prophets and apostles were not impostors seeking gain, unlike Muhammad

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

And so that we may bring forward here certain specimens of those arguments: that the Scripture which we hold as sacred is truly such, and divinely inspired, is proved from the condition of those who first handed it down and recommended it as divine. For if sacred Scripture is not true and divine, then the sacred writers, who profess that they wrote as God inspired them, and who testify that the things they write were either seen by them or divinely revealed to them, must have been impostors whose design was to deceive men and mock the world.

But this suspicion cannot fall on the Prophets and Apostles, by whose work Scripture has been consigned to us. For those who mean to deceive aim at that either from desire of gain, or for the sake of some pleasure, or in hope of some glory and of obtaining pleasure. Thus those who were authors of some superstition certainly won wealth and dignities for themselves by their inventions — as, for example, Muhammad, who by deceiving the world with his fables arrogated the highest empire to himself and his own. But such a thing cannot be affixed to the Prophets and Apostles except very shamelessly and against every appearance of truth.

For if the matter is estimated by the sense of men, nearly all of them were most miserable, and of a cast-down and despised condition; nor by their preaching did they produce for themselves any riches in the world, or any empire and glory among men. On the contrary, that doctrine which they asserted by word and writings stirred up against them the hatred of their fellow-citizens and of outsiders, and made them liable to infinite reproaches and insults; nay, it cast them into certain danger of life, so that most of them sealed their writings with their own blood.

Latin

XI. Atque ut argumentorum istorum specimina quaedam hic proferamus, Scripturam illam, quam pro sacra habemus, revera talem esse, et divinitus inspiratam, probatur ex conditione eorum qui primi illam tradiderunt, et pro divina commendarunt. Etenim, si Scriptura sacra vera et divina non est, oportet ut scriptores sacri, qui profitentur se Deo inspirante scripsisse, et ea quae scribunt aut esse a se visa, aut sibi divinitus revelata testantur, impostores fuerint quibus propositum fuerit homines decipere, et mundo illudere. At haec suspicio cadere non potest in Prophetas et Apostolos, quorum opera Scriptura nobis consignata est. Quibus enim est animus decipere, illi eo intendunt, vel lucri cupiditate, vel voluptatis alicujus causa, vel spe gloriae cujusdam, et voluptatis potiundae. Ita qui superstitionis alicujus authores fuerunt ii certe suis commentis opes et dignitates sibi conciliarunt: ut exempli causa, Mahumetes qui fabulis suis mundum decipiendo summum sibi suisque arrogavit imperium. Sed Prophetis et Apostolis tale quid affingi non potest, nisi valde impudenter, et contra omnem veritatis speciem. Si enim res ex sensu hominum aestimetur, omnes illi fere fuerunt miserrimi, et conditione abjecta et contempta: neque sua praedicatione ullas sibi in mundo pepererunt divitias, aut ullum imperium et apud homines gloriam. Contra vero doctrina illa, quam verbo et scriptis suis asseruerunt, concitavit in eos concivium suorum et externorum hominum odium, et reddidit eos obnoxios infinitis opprobriis, atque contumeliis: imo in certum vitae periculum conjecit, adeo ut eorum plerique scripta suo proprio sanguine obsignarint.

About this text

Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu - Sedan Theological Theses, newly rendered from the 1675 London Latin. Covers De Theologia through Angelorum & Hominum Sanctorum Cultu Romana I-LXXVII and Pars Secunda (Reformata) I-XL. Not the collected folio.

English follows locked Pitt Latin through Imaginum CLOSED + Sanctorum Cultu Romana CLOSED + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL. 1675 PDF ~384-390 (book ~370-376); Vision OCR + pdftotext + tess. No modern English. This slice densifies Sanctorum Pars Secunda I-XL. Next: Pars Secunda XLI–fin (~CI). Claim stays claimed (book densify not done).

Catalogue & scope

ESTC R17887; Wing L802. IA bub_gb_eOkHAW4G0-wC (+ EEBO 1675 for gap leaves). Densify through Sanctorum Cultu Romana I-LXXVII + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL (Pars Secunda not closed; not whole folio).

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.