Faith's object is what God has revealed; Bellarmine misstates it; primary and secondary objects; explicit and implicit faith; revelation measures explicitness; implicit faith is no pretext for ignorance
But that the nature of faith may be more fully understood, it is necessary to discuss its object and subject, cause and effects a little more widely. And indeed from what has been said it is plain that the object of faith is the things that have been revealed by God, and insofar as they have been revealed by God. So that the material object of faith is the things contained in the word of God; but the formal object is the divine authority and truth itself.
Therefore Bellarmine does not dispute rightly against our writers, as though they altogether restricted the object of saving faith to the bare promise of remission of sins. For we set the object of that faith as not only the things promised in the Gospel, but also whatever else is taught, narrated, and commanded in the word of God. Which the Apostle teaches in Hebrews 11, where speaking of justifying faith he says that by faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that the things which are seen were not made of things which appear (Hebrews 11:3). And likewise that Noah by faith believed the divine warning about the coming flood, by which, being moved with fear, he built an ark for the saving of his house (Hebrews 11:7).
But here it must be noted that not all things which are set before our faith belong equally to its object. For just as in the objects of the human sciences some things are those whose knowledge is chiefly intended, and those are called the principal object — as, for example, in Logic the syllogism and demonstration — while others are proposed only for the elucidation of those former things, and so that they may be known more easily and more richly, and these are the secondary and less principal object of the science: so also the matter stands in the doctrine of faith. For some things are set before faith primarily and chiefly, and some secondarily and less chiefly. Now that principal object is the things without which one cannot arrive at salvation, nor can life be rightly ordered: such as those called the articles of faith, summing up the mysteries of salvation, and also the divine precepts. But the word of God contains many other things which pertain only to the confirmation of those and to a fuller knowledge of them — as, for example, the various histories and miracles narrated in the Scriptures — and those are the secondary object of faith.
Further, the things that belong to the principal object of faith must be believed distinctly; for the rest it is enough if they are believed confusedly. Those things are believed distinctly which faith apprehends separately and one by one. And this is the faith which is called explicit. Confusedly, those which are not apprehended in particular, but only in some common principle in which they are contained: and this is the faith which they call implicit. For example, one who believes that the book of Judges is divinely inspired, and yet has not read it, nor heard anything from it recited: he indeed believes that the histories contained there are true, but implicitly and confusedly. But one who reads those histories, and knows one by one what is narrated in that book about Samson and Gideon and the other leaders of the Israelite people, has an explicit and distinct faith of them.
But since God has not at once and once for all manifested the whole doctrine of redemption and salvation to men, but in many ways and in many parts — and first more obscurely, then more clearly — it follows that according to the various differences of times faith ought to have been more or less explicit. For revelation is the measure of faith: and the more things are distinctly revealed, the more things faith must be extended to. And therefore from us, to whom the Gospel has been clearly made known, an explicit faith of many articles is required as necessary, for which under the Old Testament an implicit faith formerly sufficed.
But here too it must be observed that when we say an implicit faith of many things contained in the word of God is sufficient, this ought not to be taken as though it were praiseworthy to rest in any sort of knowledge of the principal heads of faith, and as though no fuller knowledge were to be sought. For although a distinct faith of a few articles is required as plainly necessary to salvation, yet this also is certain: that each person is bound to use every effort, according to the manner of his calling, to advance more and more in the doctrine of salvation, and to be more fully and richly instructed in the word of God. To which the Apostle diligently exhorts the faithful (Colossians 2:2 and 3:16). And therefore those gravely err and sin who, under the pretext of implicit faith, foster the stupid and crass ignorance of the people.
Latin
XVII. Sed ut fidei natura plenius intelligatur, necesse est de ejus objecto et subjecto, causa et effectibus paulo latius disserere. Et quidem ex dictis patet, fidei objectum esse quae a Deo revelata sunt, et quatenus sunt a Deo revelata. Ut objectum materiale fidei sint ea quae verbo Dei continentur: formale vero sit ipsa authoritas et veritas divina. XVIII. Itaque Bellarminus non recte disputat adversus nostros, quasi fidei salutaris objectum ad solam promissionem remissionis peccatorum omnino restringerent. Quippe fidei illius objectum statuimus, non tantum ea quae promittuntur in Evangelio, sed et alia quaecunque in verbo Dei docentur, narrantur, et praecipiuntur. Quod docet Apostolus Hebr. 11. ubi de fide justificante loquens, dicit, Fide nos intelligere aptata esse saecula verbo Dei, ut quae videntur non sint ex apparentibus facta. Itemque Noe per fidem credidisse admonitioni divinae de venturo diluvio, qua territus arcam construxit ad servandam domum suam. XIX. Verum hic est notandum, omnia, quae fidei nostrae objiciuntur, non perinde ad ejus objectum pertinere. Sicut enim in objectis scientiarum humanarum, quaedam sunt quorum cognitio praecipue intenditur, et ista objectum praecipuum vocantur: ut verbi causa, in Logica syllogismus et demonstratio: alia vero quae tantum proponuntur ad priorum istorum elucidationem, atque ut facilius et uberius cognoscantur: et haec sunt scientiae objectum secundarium, et minus praecipuum, ita quoque res se habet in fidei doctrina. Quaedam enim fidei objiciuntur primario et praecipue, quaedam vero secundario et minus praecipue. Objectum autem illud praecipuum, sunt ea sine quibus ad salutem perveniri non potest, nec vita recte institui: quales sunt qui vocantur articuli fidei, mysteria salutis summatim complectentes, itemque praecepta divina. Sed multa alia verbum Dei continet, quae ad istorum tantum confirmationem et cognitionem ampliorem pertinent, ut sint, verbi causa, historiae variae et miracula quae narrantur in Scripturis: et ista sunt objectum fidei secundarium. XX. Porro quae ad fidei praecipuum objectum pertinent, ea distincte credi necesse est; caetera vero sufficit, si confuse credantur. Distincte creduntur ea, quae fides apprehendit seorsim et sigillatim. Et haec est fides quae dicitur explicata. Confuse, quae non apprehenduntur in particulari, sed tantum in aliquo communi principio, in quo continentur: et haec est fides quam vocant implicitam. Exempli gratia, Qui credit librum Judicum esse divinitus inspiratum, nec tamen eum legit, nec de eo quicquam recitari audivit: is quidem credit veras esse historias quae illic habentur, sed implicite et confuse. Qui vero legit illas historias, novitque sigillatim quae in eo libro narrantur de Samsone et Gedeone, caeterisque populi Israelitici Ducibus, is earum habet fidem explicatam et distinctam. XXI. Sed cum Deus non simul et semel totam redemptionis et salutis doctrinam hominibus manifestaverit, sed multis modis, multisque partibus: ac primo obscurius, deinde clarius; inde sequitur, secundum varia temporum discrimina, fidem magis aut minus explicitam esse debuisse. Revelatio enim est fidei mensura: atque quo plura distincte revelantur, ad plura fidem extendi necesse est. Ac proinde a nobis, quibus Evangelium clare patefactum est, multorum articulorum fides explicita, ceu necessaria exigitur, quorum sub Veteri Testamento, fides implicita olim sufficiebat. XXII. Sed et hic animadvertendum, quod dicimus fidem implicitam multorum, quae Dei verbo continentur, sufficientem esse, non ita accipi debere, quasi in qualicunque praecipuorum fidei capitum notitia laudabile sit acquiescere, nec amplior sit cognitio quaerenda. Quamvis enim paucorum articulorum fides distincta, tanquam ad salutem plane necessaria exigatur, tamen et hoc certum est, unumquemque teneri omnem operam adhibere, ut pro vocationis modo, in doctrina salutis magis magisque proficiat, pleniusque et copiosius in verbo Dei instruatur. Ad quod sedulo fideles hortatur Apostolus Col. 2. 2. et 3. 16. Ac proinde graviter errant et peccant illi, qui sub praetextu fidei implicitae stupidam et crassam plebis ignorantiam fovent.
About this text
Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu - Sedan Theological Theses, newly rendered from the 1675 London Latin. Covers De Theologia through Angelorum & Hominum Sanctorum Cultu Romana I-LXXVII and Pars Secunda (Reformata) I-XL. Not the collected folio.
English follows locked Pitt Latin through Imaginum CLOSED + Sanctorum Cultu Romana CLOSED + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL. 1675 PDF ~384-390 (book ~370-376); Vision OCR + pdftotext + tess. No modern English. This slice densifies Sanctorum Pars Secunda I-XL. Next: Pars Secunda XLI–fin (~CI). Claim stays claimed (book densify not done).
Catalogue & scope
ESTC R17887; Wing L802. IA bub_gb_eOkHAW4G0-wC (+ EEBO 1675 for gap leaves). Densify through Sanctorum Cultu Romana I-LXXVII + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL (Pars Secunda not closed; not whole folio).
Witnesses
- Copy-text Locked Latin, De Theologia I-XLIII (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
- Checked print Internet Archive PDF of the 1675 Pitt folio (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext of De Theologia pages (Latin)
- Checked print Internet Archive DjVu OCR of the 1675 Pitt folio (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, De Fide I-XXII (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, De Authoritate Scripturae Pars I I-XLVII + Pars II I-XXXV + Pars III I-VIII (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, De Scripturae plenitudine densify (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.