Theological Theses · §1393

Calling ‘cross’ a mere metonymy for Christ breaks where the hymn opposes and distinguishes the cross from Christ

Modern metonymy (‘cross’ = Christ) cannot rescue texts that oppose, distinguish, and praise the cross by bodily contact apart from Christ.

Latin

XXIV. Vim autem manifestam verbis ipsis faciunt, qui, ut absurdum istud vitent, hodie volunt crucem, per Metonymiam quandam, pro Christo ipso accipi in ejusmodi precationibus. Nam quae loquendi leges patiuntur, ut crux pro Christo crucifixo sumatur, iis ipsis in locis ubi Christo opponitur, & a Christo contradistinguitur, & celebratur tanquam contactu corporis Christi nobilitata?

About this text

Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu - Sedan Theological Theses, newly rendered from the 1675 London Latin. Covers De Theologia through Angelorum & Hominum Sanctorum Cultu Romana I-LXXVII and Pars Secunda (Reformata) I-XL. Not the collected folio.

English follows locked Pitt Latin through Imaginum CLOSED + Sanctorum Cultu Romana CLOSED + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL. 1675 PDF ~384-390 (book ~370-376); Vision OCR + pdftotext + tess. No modern English. This slice densifies Sanctorum Pars Secunda I-XL. Next: Pars Secunda XLI–fin (~CI). Claim stays claimed (book densify not done).

Catalogue & scope

ESTC R17887; Wing L802. IA bub_gb_eOkHAW4G0-wC (+ EEBO 1675 for gap leaves). Densify through Sanctorum Cultu Romana I-LXXVII + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL (Pars Secunda not closed; not whole folio).

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.