The objections, and the answers

And whereas it is objected that experience is not sufficient to prove a doctrine unsupported by Scripture. That madmen and enthusiasts of every kind have imagined such a witness. That the design of that witness is to prove our profession genuine, which design it does not answer.

That the Scripture says, The tree is known by its fruit. Examine yourselves. Prove your own selves. And that, meanwhile, the direct witness is never referred to in all the book of God. That it does not secure us from the greatest delusions. And, lastly, that the change worked in us is a sufficient testimony, except in such trials as Christ alone suffered.

We answer. First, experience is sufficient to confirm a doctrine which is grounded on Scripture. Second, though many fancy they experience what they do not, this is no prejudice to real experience. Third, the design of that witness is to assure us we are children of God, and this design it does answer.

Fourth, the true witness of the Spirit is known by its fruit, love, peace, joy, not indeed coming before it, but following it. Fifth, it cannot be proved that the direct witness, as well as the indirect witness, is not referred to in that very text, Do you not know your own selves, that Jesus Christ is in you? Sixth, the Spirit of God witnessing with our spirit does secure us from all delusion. And, lastly, we are all liable to trials in which the testimony of our own spirit is not sufficient, in which nothing less than the direct testimony of God's Spirit can assure us that we are his children.