Cap. 4 Mem. 3: Fathers on ‘pro’; dual respect of the death; conditional decree for all
From the Scriptures let us descend to the Fathers. It is plain among them that this proposition, Christ died for these human beings, does not avail in the same way as this, Christ will by his death save these human beings infallibly. We will be content with a few testimonies, because the matter is most well known to those who are even moderately versed in the Fathers’ writings. Ambrose, on Psalm 118, affirms that Christ suffered for all, and yet at once adds that those who do not believe in Christ defraud themselves of this general benefit. Therefore for Ambrose, Christ suffering for someone, and deciding by his passion that someone is to be saved infallibly, do not sound the same. Prosper, to the Chapters of the Gauls, reply 6: Most rightly is the Savior said to have been crucified for the redemption of the whole world. Yet the same affirms, Sentence 9, that although Christ’s blood is the price of the whole world, yet those are strangers from this price who, delighted with their captivity, were unwilling to be redeemed. So that of these it is rightly said, The Redeemer of the world gave his blood for the world, and the world was unwilling to be redeemed — to the Chapters of the Gauls, reply 9. Therefore with Prosper these two are not counted as of equal force: Christ was crucified for these, and Christ will procure that these be saved infallibly. Theophylact on (Hebrews 2:9): God gave his Son to us unto death, not for the faithful only, but for the whole circle of the lands. For although not all are saved, yet he fulfilled what was of his office. From which words it is plain that for Theophylact it is not the same if someone has said, Christ was given by God that he might die for all, as if he had said, Christ by God’s absolute good pleasure will save all through his death. I pass over more testimonies.
Finally I add this. From the mere force of these words, Christ died for all, it cannot be inferred that Christ died for all in such a way that he absolutely decreed by this his death to work the salvation of all efficaciously and infallibly: because truly and properly he is said to die for someone who dies for procuring another’s good, even if that other by his own vice perceives no advantage thence. For the particle for denotes a respect to another in the will and intention of the one dying; but it does not perpetually and necessarily involve such a respect that no one is rightly said to die for another unless he has decreed by his death to free the other absolutely and infallibly from death. For what if under some condition he renders liberation from death possible for guilty human beings, which without his death was impossible? Is he not by this alone truly asserted dead for them? Ambrose asserts it, who writes that Christ came for the salvation of all, and undertook the redemption of all, inasmuch as he opened a remedy by which all could escape, although there are many who ascribe the causes of their death to themselves, because they were unwilling to be cured. We do not therefore deny that the particle for in the sacred Scriptures, when Christ’s death is treated, sometimes designates that special intention according to which liberation from death and transfer into life is infallibly destined for those for whom he is asserted dead: but that this is so perpetual or necessary that the truth of this assertion, Christ died for all, does not stand unless it is posited that he had that absolute intention of saving all — that at last we utterly deny. You see now that that secret and absolute good pleasure concerning saving human beings, according to the inscrutable order of predestination, is not necessary for this, that Christ be rightly and truly said to have suffered and died for all.
What then is necessary? I will say in few words. Since Christ’s death has a double respect, one to God, to whom this precious lytron was offered and paid, the other to human beings, for whom it was offered and paid: Christ is said to have suffered, been offered, or died for all, if by his death and passion it is established that he effected that God himself is understood otherwise disposed toward giving eternal life to all human beings than he would be without this death of Christ; and also if it is established that any human being has, by the virtue of Christ’s death, some right of claiming for himself remission of sins and eternal life, which with this death shut out he could in no way have or claim. Either of these clearly shows that the force of Christ’s death extends itself to the whole human race, and therefore that we speak neither falsely nor improperly when we say that Christ died for all human beings.
As to the former: It is certain that, with respect to Christ’s death, God’s will is now otherwise compared toward all and each human being than it would be without it. For by this very thing, that Christ in his human nature suffered death, without any other medium intervening, this at least has been effected with God, that he wills to be reconciled to any human being believing and penitent, to remit sins, to confer eternal life. Hence for Cain, if he has done well and repented, remission is prepared on God’s part (Genesis 4:7). Hence to any wicked person it is said in God’s own name, If he shall have turned from his sins, he shall altogether live, he shall not die (Ezekiel 18:21). Take away the respect of Christ’s death present to the Divine mind and embracing the human race, and nothing true, solid, or serious would underlie promises of this kind as to the non-elect. For the promise of conditioned remission ought to have its truth in Christ’s death no less than the remission itself which is granted when the condition is performed. Nor does anything avail to break this universal force which Christ’s death obtained with God, that no one of the non-elect fulfills that Evangelical condition of faith and penitence; for it is enough that by the force of Christ’s death, and of the Divine ordination stabilized through it, if the condition were fulfilled by any human being, the benefit of remission and eternal life would doubtless follow.
Now as to what looks to the latter: that also is certain and connected, that any human being can claim for himself this right by the benefit of Christ’s death, that if he has believed, at once all his sins are deleted, and he himself is adopted as heir of eternal life. For although, because of defect of the fulfilled condition, many cannot in fact claim these promised goods, yet there is no mortal who, if the condition had been fulfilled by him, would not have had them redound upon him from the force of Christ’s death. This conditioned decree of God stabilized by Christ’s death, and revealed in the Gospel — from which we understand that God by the virtue of Christ’s passion has obliged himself to give remission of sins and eternal life to every believer, and from which there has accrued a universal right not to these or those singular persons, but to any individual of the human race, of obtaining remission under the aforesaid condition — sufficiently suffices for this, that Christ be truly asserted to have suffered for all human beings. Nor is this conditioned decree firmed by Christ’s death and extended to all to be despised as a thing of nothing because the infallible fulfillment of the condition depends on another secret decree: since that secret decree, inasmuch as it embraces these or those singular persons, is utterly unknown to us, and therefore is scarcely to be preached to anyone by name; but this conditioned decree, which comprehends the whole human race, is to be announced to all and each, as the most solid foundation of our Evangelical doctrine, according to that of the Apostle (Romans 10:8–9, 11): This is that word of faith which we preach, namely, That if you shall have confessed with your mouth the Lord Jesus, and shall have believed in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. For the Scripture says, Whoever believes in him will not be put to shame. This benefit by the virtue of Christ’s death is exposed and obtainable to all human beings under the condition of faith; and in that respect Christ is affirmed dead for all.
Latin
A Scripturis ad Patres descendamus. Manifestum est apud illos non perinde valere hanc propositionem, Christus pro hisce hominibus mortuus est, atque hanc, Christus hosce homines sua morte infallibiliter servabit. Pauculis testimoniis erimus contenti, quia res notissima est illis qui sunt in Patrum scriptis mediocriter versati. Ambrosius, in Psal. 118, affirmat, Christum pro omnibus passum, et tamen statim subjungit, Eos qui non credunt in Christum generali hoc beneficio se fraudare. Non igitur Ambrosio perinde sonant, Christum pati pro aliquo, et passione sua infallibiliter servandum decernere. Prosper, ad Capit. Gallor. resp. 6, Rectissime dicitur Salvator pro totius mundi redemtione crucifixus. Idem tamen affirmat, Sent. 9, Licet sanguis Christi sit pretium totius mundi, tamen ab hoc pretio extraneos esse qui delectati captivitate sua redimi noluerunt. Ita ut de hisce recte dicatur, Redemtor mundi dedit pro mundo sanguinem suum, et mundus redimi noluit, Ad cap. Gallor. resp. 9. Non igitur apud Prosperum haec duo censentur isodynamounta, Christus pro hisce crucifixus est, et Christus hosce infallibiliter servandos procurabit. Theophylactus in Heb. ii. 9, Deus Filium suum nobis dedit in mortem, non pro fidelibus tantum, sed pro universo terrarum orbe. Etsi enim non omnes sunt servati, ipse tamen quod sui officii erat implevit. Ex quibus verbis patet, Theophylacto non idem esse, si quis dixerit, Christus a Deo datus est ut moreretur pro omnibus, ac si dixisset, Christus ex absoluto Dei beneplacito omnes per mortem suam servabit. Pluribus testimoniis supersedeo. Tandem illud adjungo. Ex sola vi horum verborum, Christus pro omnibus mortuus est, non posse inferri, Christum pro omnibus ita mortuum fuisse, ut absolute decreverit hac sua morte omnium salutem efficaciter et infallibiliter operari: quia sane vere et proprie pro aliquo mori is dicatur qui bono alterius procurando moritur, quamvis ille alter suo vitio nihil commodi inde percipiat. Particula enim pro denotat respectum ad alterum in voluntate et intentione morientis; sed non perpetuo et necessario talem respectum involvit ut pro alio mori nemo recte dicatur, nisi qui decreverit per mortem suam alterum absolute et infallibiliter a morte liberare. Quid enim si sub conditione aliqua reddat liberationem a morte hominibus reis possibilem, quae absque ejus morte fuit impossibilis? Annon hoc solo nomine vere pro illis mortuus asseratur? Asserit Ambrosius, qui scribit, Christum pro salute universorum advenisse, et omnium redemtionem suscepisse, quatenus appertuit remedium quo possent omnes evadere, quamvis multi sint qui mortis suae causas sibi adscribant, quia curari noluerunt. Non igitur negamus particulam pro in sacris Scripturis, cum de morte Christi agitur, aliquando specialem illam intentionem designare juxta quam liberatio a morte et translatio in vitam illis infallibiliter destinatur pro quibus mortuus asseritur: sed hoc ita perpetuum aut necessarium esse, ut non stet veritas hujus assertionis, Christus pro omnibus mortuus est, nisi ponatur habuisse intentionem illam absolutam omnes salvandi, id demum pernegamus. Videtis jam arcanum illud et absolutum beneplacitum de servandis hominibus, juxta inscrutabilem ordinem praedestinationis, non esse ad hoc necessarium, ut Christus recte et vere dicatur passus et mortuus pro omnibus. Quid igitur necessarium est? Dicam paucis. Quandoquidem Christi mors duplicem respectum habet, unum ad Deum, cui oblatum et persolutum fuit hoc pretiosum lytron, alterum ad homines, pro quibus oblatum fuit et persolutum; Christus pro omnibus passus, oblatus sive mortuus dicatur, si morte et passione sua constiterit illum effecisse, ut Deus ipse ad vitam aeternam omnibus hominibus donandam aliter dispositus intelligatur, quam esset absque hac morte Christi; atque etiam si illud constiterit, quemvis hominem in remissionem peccatorum et vitam aeternam sibi vendicandam habere virtute mortis Christi aliquid juris, quod hac morte seclusa habere, aut vendicare nullo modo posset. Utrumvis horum luculente ostendit vim mortis Christi ad totum humanum genus se extendere, atque idcirco nos nec falso nec improprie loqui, quando dicimus Christum pro omnibus hominibus fuisse mortuum. Quod attinet ad prius, Certum est, respectu mortis Christi voluntatem Dei aliter jam esse comparatam ad omnes et singulos homines quam esset absque ea: Nam hoc ipso quod Christus in natura sua humana mortem passus est, sine alio ullo medio interveniente, hoc saltem apud Deum effectum est, ut velit cuivis homini credenti et poenitenti reconciliari, peccata remittere, vitam aeternam conferre. Hinc Caino, si bene egerit et resipuerit, ex parte Dei parata est remissio, Gen. iv. 7. Hinc improbo cuicunque dicitur nomine ipsius Dei, Si conversus fuerit a peccatis suis, omnino vivet, non morietur, Ezek. xviii. 21. Tolle respectum mortis Christi menti Divinae obversantem, et humanum genus complectentem, hujusmodi promissionibus quoad non-electos nihil veri, solidi, aut seri subiisset. Conditionatae enim remissionis promissio eam in morte Christi habere debet suam veritatem, quam ipsa remissio quae praestita conditione indulgetur. Neque quicquam refert ad infringendam hanc universalem vim, quam apud Deum obtinuit mors Christi, quod nemo ex non-electis illam Evangelicam fidei et poenitentiae conditionem impleat; sufficit enim, quod vi mortis Christi, ac ordinationis Divinae per eam stabilitae, si conditio a quocunque homine impleretur, beneficium remissionis et vitae aeternae indubie sequeretur. Jam quod ad posterius spectat, illud quoque certum est, atque connexum; quemlibet hominem beneficio mortis Christi hoc juris sibi vendicare posse, ut, si crediderit, protinus omnia sua peccata deleantur, et ipse in haeredem vitae aeternae adoptetur. Quamvis enim, propter defectum impletae conditionis, multi non possunt de facto haec promissa bona vendicare, nemo tamen mortalium est, si conditio fuisset ab eo impleta, in quem ex vi mortis Christi non redundassent. Hoc conditionatum Dei decretum morte Christi stabilitum, et in Evangelio revelatum, ex quo intelligimus Deum virtute passionis Christi obligasse seipsum ad dandam remissionem peccatorum et vitam aeternam omni credenti, et ex quo accreverit jus universale non his aut illis singularibus personis, sed cuilibet humani generis individuo, ad remissionem sub praedicta conditione obtinendam, satis sufficit ad hoc ut Christus pro omnibus hominibus passus vere afferatur. Neque quasi res nihili contemnendum est hoc conditionatum decretum morte Christi firmatum et ad omnes extensum, quia infallibilis conditionis impletio ex alio arcano decreto dependet: cum illud arcanum decretum, quatenus has aut illas singulares personas complectitur, sit nobis prorsus incognitum; ac proinde haud cuiquam nominatim praedicandum; hoc autem conditionatum decretum, quod totum humanum genus comprehendit, sit omnibus et singulis annunciandum, utpote Evangelicae nostrae doctrinae solidissimum fundamentum, juxta illud Apostoli, Rom. x. 8, 9, 11. Hoc est verbum illud fidei quod nos praedicamus, nempe, Quod si confessus fueris ore tuo Dominum Jesum, et credideris in corde tuo quod Deus eum excitavit a mortuis, salvus eris. Dicit enim Scriptura, Quisquis credit in eum non pudefiet. Hoc beneficium virtute mortis Christi est sub conditione fidei omnibus hominibus expositum et parabile; et eo respectu Christus pro omnibus mortuus affirmatur.
About this text
John Davenant — Dissertationes duae from the 1650 Cambridge Latin. Honest partial through De praedestinatione Cap. 1 subject tip; Cap. 1 mid-Thesis and remainder remain; De praedestinatione Cap. 1 Prolegomena IV distinguishing conditions tip; De praedestinatione Cap. II Variae (Pelagian opening) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. II Scholastici / Vasquez Arg. 1 tip; De praedestinatione Cap. II Arg. 2 praescientia tip; De praedestinatione Cap. II Arg. 3 (1 Cor. 2:9) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. II Arg. 4 (2 Tim. 2:21) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. II Arg. 5 (1 Tim. 2:4) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. II Arg. 6 (James 2:5) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. II Arg. 7 (Apoc. 3:11) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. III Rat. 1 (common inefficacious will) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. III Rat. 2 (Vasquez physical vs moral media) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. III Rat. 3 (king/prize / victory foresight) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. III Rat. 4 (optimum modus / crown of justice) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. III Rat. 5 (acceptor personarum) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. III Rat. 6 (misericordia/congruitas) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. III Rat. 7 (equal disposition) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. III Rat. 8 (few saved / major part) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. III Rat. 9 (Stephen / glory from others' sins) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. III Rat. 10 (mere beneplacitum / Predestinati) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. III reprobation ratio (foresight of sin) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. III Rat. 12 (efficacious election / free choice) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. III Rat. 13 (hortation/prayer) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. III Rat. 14 (decree/execution conformity) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. IV Arminianorum open tip; De praedestinatione Cap. IV Arg. 1 Sol tip; De praedestinatione Cap. IV Arg. 7 (τρόπος; Rom. 9:22) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. IV Arg. 8 (ordo exsecutionis) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. IV Arg. 9 (Christus fundamentum) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. V Obj. 1 (amor ad salutem) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. V Obj. 2 (actualis vitae datio) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. V Obj. 3 (qualis existens) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. V Obj. 4 (justitiae satisfactio) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. V Obj. 5 (natura vitae aeternae) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. V Obj. 6 (Christus a decreto) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. V Obj. 7 (Evangelium invertitur) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. V Obj. 8 (arcana/revelata) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. VI (Orthodoxa sententia) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. VI Arg. 2 (gratia specialis) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. VI Arg. 3 (Scripturae) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. VI Arg. 4 (vocatio) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. VI Arg. 5 (adjutorium) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. VI Arg. 7 (inconveniens) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. VI Arg. 8 (perseverantia) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. VI Arg. 9 (unica ratio) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. VI Arg. 10 (abyssus) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. VI Arg. 11 (efficacia) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. VI Arg. 12 (segregativum) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. VI Arg. 13 (pura gratia) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. VII open (reprobatio) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. VII Junius trifariam tip; De praedestinatione Cap. VIII open (adversariorum) tip; Cap. VIII peccata-causa tip; Cap. VIII fewer-reprobates tip; Cap. VIII Argentina tip; Cap. VIII dives-misericordia tip; Cap. VIII Corvinus tip into Cap. IX; Cap. IX Ab Adae tip; Cap. IX Ab Adae Christus omnibus+Minor tip; Cap. IX Arg. 3 Sol tip; Cap. IX vocatione Evangelica tip; Cap. IX vocatione Sol cont. tip; Cap. IX Arg. 6 Sol cont. tip.
English follows locked 1650 Cambridge Latin of De morte Christi Cap. 1-6 opening (origin + Thesis 1 + Cap. 2 Rat. 1-ultima + Cap. 3 Satisfit through Obj. 17 + Cap. 4 Thesis 2 tip through Mem. 1 close + Cap. 4 Mem. 2 through Mem. 3 tip + Cap. 4 Mem. 3 possible-faith through Thesis 2 close + Cap. 5 Thesis 3 tip through Mem. 2 Scripture close + Cap. 5 Mem. 2 Rat. 1-4 + Cap. 5 Mem. 2 Fathers tip + Cap. 5 Mem. 2 Huberiana objections tip through Obj. 3 Solut close + Cap. 5 Mem. 2 elect-from-eternity objections tip through Obj. 3 Solut close + Cap. 5 Mem. 2 Scripture elect objections tip through Cap. 5 thesis close + Cap. 6 opening tip through Arg. 1 close before Arg. 2), reconstructed from the Internet Archive PDF (pdftotext + tesseract) of the Roger Daniel folio with DjVu OCR check. The 1683 reprint was not used as copy-text. No modern English was copied.
Witnesses
- Copy-text Locked Latin, De morte Christi Cap. 1-5 densify through Cap. 5 Mem. 2 Fathers tip (Daniel 1650) (Latin)
- Print Facsimile Internet Archive PDF of the 1650 Cambridge folio (Latin)
- Checked print Internet Archive DjVu OCR of the 1650 Cambridge folio (Latin)
This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.