Two Dissertations · §16

Cap. 3 Obj. 5: Universal satisfaction would punish the same sins twice — so how can justice stand?

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Obj. 5. If Christ's death is a benefit applicable to all and each by God's ordination, then it must be said that Christ satisfied for the sins of the whole human race. But this cannot be defended without meantime undermining Divine justice: for the reason of justice does not suffer the same sin to be punished twice. Grant then that Christ's death is the lytron by which satisfaction was made to God for the sins of the human race — how can these human beings still be summoned by God's justice for the same sins and tormented with eternal punishments?

Sol. As to the Major, we judge its consequence can safely be conceded. For that Christ satisfied for the sins of the human race, or of all human beings, the orthodox Fathers boldly assert. So Eusebius, Demonstration of the Gospel, book 1, in the preface: It was fitting that the Lamb of God offer himself a victim for the remaining kindred lambs and for the whole human race. So Nazianzen: Christ is the sacrifice of the whole world, an expiation never to die, Oration 2 on Easter. So finally (to omit the rest) Cyril, Catechesis 13. The same manner of speaking our Anglican Church everywhere uses in the Articles of Religion, Articles 15 and 31, and elsewhere. Indeed even those who most strive to restrict this death of Christ speak thus. We cited earlier the testimony of the reverend Pareus, Heidelberg theologian, who freely confesses in the Judgment exhibited to the Synod of Dort that the cause and matter of Christ's passion was the sense or endurance of the wrath of God, stirred up by the sin not of some human beings but of the universal human race. A little later: the universality of sin and of the wrath of God against it, endured by Christ, is affirmed. Nor should this seem dissonant, since this universal redemption, satisfaction, or expiation accomplished by Christ's death imports nothing else than that a universal cause of salvation has been established and granted to the human race by Divine ordination, by whose benefit all and each can enjoy, through the faith required by the Gospel. We therefore call Christ the Redeemer of the world, and teach that he satisfied for the sins not of some human beings but of the whole world — not because, this price being paid for the sins of this race, all and each are immediately to be freed from captivity and death, but because by the virtue of this price paid all and each can and ought to be freed from death, and in fact are to be freed, according to the tenor of the Gospel pact, that is, if they repent and believe in this Redeemer. As to what is further urged — that it is against justice to accept satisfaction or a lytron for the sins of the universal human race, and yet not free all from the punishments of their sins, but adjudge many to eternal torments notwithstanding this satisfaction — to this I answer: This would indeed be most iniquitous if we had paid this price to God from our own, or if our Surety Jesus Christ had so offered his blood to God as a satisfactory price for the redemption of the human race that, no other condition intervening, all human beings would by the very fact of the oblation be immediately absolved, or if God himself had covenanted with the dying Christ that he willed to pour faith into all and each and to give all else that looks to the infallible application of this sacrifice offered for the human race. But since God himself arranged that this price from his own be paid to himself, it was in his power to attach conditions — which being fulfilled, this death would be fruitful to any human being; not being fulfilled, it would help no human being at all. No injury therefore is done to those human beings who are punished by God after the lytron for the sins of the human race has been accepted, because they themselves exhibited nothing to God in satisfaction for their sins, nor fulfilled that condition without which God was unwilling that this satisfactory price should turn to the good of any singular person. Further, neither should this be judged injurious to Christ the Mediator: for he so willed to die for all, and to number the price of redemption to the Father for all, that meanwhile he willed not all and each in any way whatever, but all and each as soon as they believed in him, to be absolved from the guilt of their sins. Finally Christ, offering himself in sacrifice to God the Father for expiating the world's sins, yet submitted to the Father's good pleasure the free distribution and application of his merits, and no pact was entered between Father and Son by which God is bound to effect that this death of Christ, which by God's ordination is applicable to all under the condition of faith, become applied to all through the gift of faith. We must not therefore deny that Christ's oblation once made is a perfect satisfaction for the sins not of some human beings only but of all — yet so that he who is said simply to have died for all conditionally promises from his death remission of sins and salvation, and will perform it, only to believers. Let us illustrate all this by a likeness: Think of countless human beings cast into prison by some King for an enormous debt, or condemned to death for the crime of high treason; and the King himself procuring that his son wipe out this whole debt to the last farthing, or put himself as guilty for those traitors and endure the punishments owed by all — yet with this law promulgated by both: that none is to be absolved or freed except those alone who will acknowledge this King's Son as their lawful Lord and serve him. These things being so established, I ask: if those are not freed who persist disobedient and rebellious against the King's son, is the crime of injustice incurred because after this lytron paid their debts are nonetheless exacted from many, or after the punishments endured by the son vengeance is nevertheless taken on these rebels? By no means: because the payment of a just price and the enduring of due punishments was indeed ordained to obtain remission for anyone under the condition of obedience, and not otherwise. I will not add more: it will be easy to accommodate all this to our present purpose.

Latin

Obj. 5. Si Christi mors sit beneficium ex ordinatione Dei omnibus et singulis applicabile, tum dicendum est Christum satisfecisse pro peccatis totius humani generis: At hoc defendi non potest, ut interim minime labefactemus justitiam Divinam: Siquidem justitiae ratio non patitur ut bis in idem peccatum vindicetur. Fac igitur Christi mortem esse lytron quo satisfactum fuit Deo pro peccatis humani generis, quomodo ob eadem peccata hi homines a justitia Dei conveniri possunt et poenis aeternis cruciari? Sol. Quod attinet ad Majorem, putamus ejus consequentiam tuto posse concedi. Christum enim satisfecisse pro peccatis humani generis, vel omnium hominum, intrepide afferunt orthodoxi Patres. Sic Eusebius, Demonstr. Evang. lib. 1. in praefat. Oportebat Agnum Dei pro reliquis cognatis agnis et pro omni humano genere victimam offerre. Sic Nazianzenus, Christus hostia totius mundi nunquam intermoritura expiatio est, Orat. 2. in Pasch. Sic denique (ut caeteros mittam) Cyrillus, Catech. 13. Eandem loquendi formulam Ecclesia nostra Anglicana passim usurpat in Articulis religionis, Artic. 15. 31. et alibi. Imo ita loquuntur et illi qui hanc mortem Christi vel maxime conantur restringere. Allatum fuit antea a nobis testimonium reverendi Parei Theologi Heidelbergensis, qui ultro fatetur in Judicio exhib. Synod. Dordrecht. Causam et materiam passionis Christi fuisse sensum sive sustinentiam irae Dei, peccato non aliquorum hominum sed universi generis humani concitatae. Paulo post, Universitatis peccati et irae Dei adversus illud a Christo toleratae affirmatur. Neque hoc absonum videri debet, cum haec universalis redemtio, satisfactio sive expiatio morte Christi peracta nihil aliud inferat quam universalem causam salutis humano generi Divina ordinatione stabilitam et indultam esse, cujus beneficio omnes et singuli frui possunt, mediante fide per Evangelium requisita. Appellamus igitur Christum mundi Redemtorem, atque docemus illum satisfecisse pro peccatis non aliquorum hominum sed totius mundi, non quod soluto hoc pretio pro peccatis hujus generis omnes et singuli sunt illico a captivitate et morte liberandi, sed quod virtute hujus pretii persoluti omnes et singuli possunt et debent a morte liberari, et de facto sunt liberandi, juxta pacti Evangelici tenorem, id est, si resipiscant ac credant in hunc Redemtorem. Quod porro urgetur, Esse contra justitiam accipere satisfactionem vel lytron pro peccatis universi humani generis, et tamen non omnes liberare a poenis peccatorum suorum, sed multos non obstante hac satisfactione aeternis cruciatibus adjudicare; ad hoc respondeo, Esset hoc quidem iniquissimum, si nos de nostro hoc pretium Deo persolvissemus, vel si Fidejussor noster Jesus Christus sanguinem suum tanquam pretium satisfactorium ita Deo obtulisset in redemtionem humani generis ut nulla alia conditione interveniente omnes homines ipso facto oblationis statim absolverentur, vel ipse Deus pactus fuisset cum Christo moriente, velle se omnibus et singulis fidem infundere, caeteraque omnia donare quae spectant ad infallibilem hujus hostiae pro humano genere oblatae applicationem: Sed cum ipse Deus de suo hoc pretium sibi persolvendum curaverit, penes illum fuit conditiones annectere, quibus praestitis haec mors cuivis homini esset fructuosa, minime praestitis quemvis hominem nihil juvaret. Nulla igitur injuria fit illis hominibus qui puniuntur a Deo post acceptatum lytron pro peccatis humani generis, quia ipsi nihil Deo exhibuerunt in satisfactionem pro peccatis suis, nec praestiterunt illam conditionem absque qua praestita noluit Deus ut hoc pretium satisfactorium cederet in bonum ullius personae singularis. Porro, nec Christo Mediatori hoc injuriosum censeri debet: Nam ipse sic mori voluit pro omnibus, et pro omnibus pretium redemtionis Patri numerare, ut interim non omnes et singulos quocunque modo, sed omnes ac singulos simulac crederent in eum, a reatu suorum peccatorum absolvi voluerit. Denique Christus pro expiandis mundi peccatis offerens sese in sacrificium Deo Patri, submisit tamen Patris beneplacito liberam distributionem et applicationem meritorum suorum, neque pactum ullum initum est inter Patrem et Filium, quo Deus tenetur efficere ut haec mors Christi, quae est ex ordinatione Dei omnibus applicabilis sub conditione fidei, fiat omnibus applicata per donationem fidei. Non ergo debemus negare oblationem Christi semel factam esse perfectam satisfactionem pro peccatis non aliquorum hominum solummodo sed omnium; ita tamen ut is qui simpliciter pro omnibus mortuus dicatur, ex morte sua remissionem peccatorum et salutem conditionaliter promittat et praestiturus sit solis credentibus. Similitudine haec omnia illustremus: Cogitate innumeros homines ob ingens debitum in carcerem a Rege aliquo conjectos; vel ob crimen laesae Majestatis capite damnatos; ipsum autem Regem procurare ut filius suus ad extremum assem hoc totum debitum dispungat, vel pro istis proditoribus se reum supponat, poenasque omnibus debitas sustineat, promulgata ab utroque tamen hac lege Neminem absolvendum aut liberandum esse extra eos solos qui hunc Regis Filium pro Domino suo legitimo agnoscere, illique inservire volunt. Hisce ita constitutis, quaero; si non liberentur qui perstant immorigeri et in filium Regis rebelles, nunquid injustitiae crimen incuratur ex eo quod post lytron hoc persolutum debita tamen sua a multis exigantur, aut post poenas a filio toleratas in hosce rebelles nihilominus vindicetur? Nullo modo: quia justi pretii persolutio ac poenarum debitarum toleratio ordinata quidem fuit ad remissionem cuivis impetrandam sub conditione obedientiae, et non aliter. Non addam plura: praesenti nostro instituto facile erit haec omnia accommodare.

About this text

John Davenant — Dissertationes duae from the 1650 Cambridge Latin. Honest partial through De praedestinatione Cap. 1 subject tip; Cap. 1 mid-Thesis and remainder remain; De praedestinatione Cap. 1 Prolegomena IV distinguishing conditions tip; De praedestinatione Cap. II Variae (Pelagian opening) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. II Scholastici / Vasquez Arg. 1 tip; De praedestinatione Cap. II Arg. 2 praescientia tip; De praedestinatione Cap. II Arg. 3 (1 Cor. 2:9) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. II Arg. 4 (2 Tim. 2:21) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. II Arg. 5 (1 Tim. 2:4) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. II Arg. 6 (James 2:5) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. II Arg. 7 (Apoc. 3:11) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. III Rat. 1 (common inefficacious will) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. III Rat. 2 (Vasquez physical vs moral media) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. III Rat. 3 (king/prize / victory foresight) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. III Rat. 4 (optimum modus / crown of justice) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. III Rat. 5 (acceptor personarum) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. III Rat. 6 (misericordia/congruitas) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. III Rat. 7 (equal disposition) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. III Rat. 8 (few saved / major part) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. III Rat. 9 (Stephen / glory from others' sins) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. III Rat. 10 (mere beneplacitum / Predestinati) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. III reprobation ratio (foresight of sin) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. III Rat. 12 (efficacious election / free choice) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. III Rat. 13 (hortation/prayer) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. III Rat. 14 (decree/execution conformity) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. IV Arminianorum open tip; De praedestinatione Cap. IV Arg. 1 Sol tip; De praedestinatione Cap. IV Arg. 7 (τρόπος; Rom. 9:22) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. IV Arg. 8 (ordo exsecutionis) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. IV Arg. 9 (Christus fundamentum) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. V Obj. 1 (amor ad salutem) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. V Obj. 2 (actualis vitae datio) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. V Obj. 3 (qualis existens) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. V Obj. 4 (justitiae satisfactio) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. V Obj. 5 (natura vitae aeternae) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. V Obj. 6 (Christus a decreto) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. V Obj. 7 (Evangelium invertitur) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. V Obj. 8 (arcana/revelata) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. VI (Orthodoxa sententia) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. VI Arg. 2 (gratia specialis) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. VI Arg. 3 (Scripturae) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. VI Arg. 4 (vocatio) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. VI Arg. 5 (adjutorium) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. VI Arg. 7 (inconveniens) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. VI Arg. 8 (perseverantia) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. VI Arg. 9 (unica ratio) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. VI Arg. 10 (abyssus) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. VI Arg. 11 (efficacia) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. VI Arg. 12 (segregativum) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. VI Arg. 13 (pura gratia) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. VII open (reprobatio) tip; De praedestinatione Cap. VII Junius trifariam tip; De praedestinatione Cap. VIII open (adversariorum) tip; Cap. VIII peccata-causa tip; Cap. VIII fewer-reprobates tip; Cap. VIII Argentina tip; Cap. VIII dives-misericordia tip; Cap. VIII Corvinus tip into Cap. IX; Cap. IX Ab Adae tip; Cap. IX Ab Adae Christus omnibus+Minor tip; Cap. IX Arg. 3 Sol tip; Cap. IX vocatione Evangelica tip; Cap. IX vocatione Sol cont. tip; Cap. IX Arg. 6 Sol cont. tip.

English follows locked 1650 Cambridge Latin of De morte Christi Cap. 1-6 opening (origin + Thesis 1 + Cap. 2 Rat. 1-ultima + Cap. 3 Satisfit through Obj. 17 + Cap. 4 Thesis 2 tip through Mem. 1 close + Cap. 4 Mem. 2 through Mem. 3 tip + Cap. 4 Mem. 3 possible-faith through Thesis 2 close + Cap. 5 Thesis 3 tip through Mem. 2 Scripture close + Cap. 5 Mem. 2 Rat. 1-4 + Cap. 5 Mem. 2 Fathers tip + Cap. 5 Mem. 2 Huberiana objections tip through Obj. 3 Solut close + Cap. 5 Mem. 2 elect-from-eternity objections tip through Obj. 3 Solut close + Cap. 5 Mem. 2 Scripture elect objections tip through Cap. 5 thesis close + Cap. 6 opening tip through Arg. 1 close before Arg. 2), reconstructed from the Internet Archive PDF (pdftotext + tesseract) of the Roger Daniel folio with DjVu OCR check. The 1683 reprint was not used as copy-text. No modern English was copied.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.