System of Sacred Theology · §9

Faith forms reason under Scripture; Lesbia rule; Durandus; Richard of St Victor

Note here, however: when the proper and interior truth of the mysteries brought into controversy comes to be explained by God's Word, the canon is by no means to be formed according to the natural measure of human reason and that hitherto described by the philosophers, but according to the genius and dictate of faith, which under a new light subjects reason in its mysteries to God's Word, even against blind reason's blind judgment. For example, Scripture teaches that Mary's only-begotten is God's only-begotten Son, and that this man begotten from Mary is the eternal God; likewise, that God suffered, and things like these. Which words by their native signification do not yield that sense of which reason by its natural light is capable, and which can be measured and grasped according to that norm delineated in the genera of logical predications.

Nor is it needful here that the significations of these words be turned so long by artful translations until they yield such a sense as can be comprehended by reason's natural capacity according to logical rules — because the truth of the divine mysteries and institutions exceeds the natural capacity of human reason, and does not temper itself to human wisdom and logical rules, as things and actions subject to reason are customarily disposed and treated according to logical rules. For logic is like the Lesbian rule, which ought to accommodate itself to things as they are; nor are things and their necessary and contingent connections, known by nature or divinely revealed, to be twisted to rules found by logicians from considering natural and moral things. Where therefore the truth of a statement is revealed in the Scriptures as singular and unusual, there the logician ceases; if he is a Christian he believes God revealing, and gladly confesses that his rules fail, and heartily rescinds his own decrees in God's honor.

But whatever right reason demonstrates to be alien to God's wisdom, goodness, equity, and justice — so far that it is alien even from the human — that is to be flatly rejected and spat out. Indeed whatever is absurd, false, and foolish according to right reason is absurd, false, and foolish before God and everywhere — as if someone should say that one is two, that one and two do not make three, that three are even, four odd, and that if we take equals from equals what remain are not equal, and if anything else truly implies a contradiction. For it cannot be that two contradictories are true at once. Let faith be present, and there will be no question. For to scrutinize mysteries is rashness; to believe is piety; to know is eternal blessedness.

Yet here too there is a grave stumbling-block: how does Christian faith prevail over philosophical science? Durandus says: To every knower it can be established concerning his conclusion that it is true, and that it is impossible for it to be otherwise. But concerning a conclusion deduced from principles only believed, it cannot be established for the one deducing that it is impossible for it to be otherwise, nor that it is true. For no more can be established concerning the conclusion than concerning the principles, since knowledge of conclusions depends on knowledge of principles. But we reply that God's Word is indeed the firmest principle of faith, yet one that has its own tokens which argue that the sacred Bibles are the true Word of the most true God; and although in these themselves the human mind acting in a human way now and then wavers, yet God, by illuminating it through that very Word and drawing the will into obedience, so confirms the certainty of the principle that the believer with joyful breast does not hesitate to seal it with his blood. With the principle thus established and unmoved, whatever is comprehended in it is believed with equal firmness, so that thus an infallible full assurance of both the principle and the conclusions drawn from it is given.

For if one proceeds so that to the deduction of tokens by which a persuaded man at first believes that the prophetic and Apostolic Word is the most true Word of the most true God, there is joined that Word's power and efficacy in illuminating the mind and strengthening the hearer's assent perpetually depending on the Word — then what otherwise perpetually fluctuates is set most firmly in our souls. And on this depends the conclusion of Richard of St. Victor, called a solid Doctor: As many of us as are truly faithful — that is, gifted with true faith kindled by divine illumination through the mediation of God's Word — hold nothing more certain, nothing more constant, than what we apprehend by faith. Would that the Jews would attend, would that the pagans would notice, with how great security of conscience we shall be able to approach the divine judgment. Shall we not with all confidence be able to say to God: Lord, if it is error, we have been deceived by you yourself? For these things in us have been confirmed by such great signs and wonders and such as can be done only through you, which also have been handed down to us by men of highest holiness, proved with highest and authentic attestation, you yourself cooperating, confirming the word with following signs? Note here the Lord's cooperation with God's preached Word, besides external miracles — as Christ (John 5:20) reckons the vivification which he performs through the gospel among works greater than visible signs.

Latin

Hic tamen nota, cum propria & interior mysteriorum, quae in controversiam adducta sunt, veritas Dei verbo explicanda venit, canon secundum humanae rationis naturalem modulum & hactenus a philosophis descriptam, nullo modo, sed secundum ingenium & dictamen fidei, quae sub nova luce rationem in mysteriis suis verbo Dei subjicit, etiam contra caecae rationis caecum judicium, formanda est. Verbi gratia, scriptura docet, Mariae unigenitum esse Dei filium unigenitum, & hunc hominem, qui e Maria genitus est, esse aeternum Deum, item, Deum esse passum, & his similia. Quae verba significatione sua nativa non pariunt eum sensum, cujus ratio per lumen suum naturale capax sit, quique secundum illius normam in praedicationum logicarum generibus delineatam, mensurari capique possit. Neque hic opus est, ut horum verborum significationes tam diu artificiosis translationibus vertantur, dum ejusmodi sensum pariant, qui naturali captu rationis, secundum regulas logicas, comprehendi possit: quia veritas mysteriorum & institutorum divinorum naturalem rationis humanae captum excedit, neque humanae sapientiae, logicisque regulis sese attemperat, sicuti res & actiones rationi subjectae, secundum regulas logicas disponi atque tractari solent. Logica enim est instar regulae Lesbiae, quae sese rebus accommodare debet, ut sunt: neque res rerumque connexiones necessariae & contingentes, natura notae aut divinitus revelatae, torqueri ad regulas a Logicis ex consideratione rerum naturalium & moralium repertas. Ubi igitur veritas enunciati in scripturis revelatur singularis & inusitata, ibi logicus cessat, Deo revelanti, si Christianus est, credit & regulas suas deficere lubens fatetur, propriaque decreta in illius honorem cordate rescindit. Quicquid vero ratio recta demonstrat alienum esse a sapientia, bonitate, aequitate & justitia Dei, usqueadeo ut etiam ab humana alienum sit, id de plano rejiciendum & respuendum est. Imo quicquid absurdum, falsum & stultum est secundum rectam rationem, id apud Deum & ubique absurdum, falsum & stultum est, ut, siquis dicat, unum esse duo, unum & duo non facere tria, tria esse paria, quatuor imparia, & ab aequalibus aequalia demamus, quae relinquuntur, non esse aequalia, & si quid aliud contradictionem revera implicat. Fieri enim nequit, ut duo contradictoria sint simul vera. Fides adsit, & nulla erit quaestio. Nam mysteria scrutari, est temeritas: credere pietas; nosse, aeterna beatitas. Est vero & hic grave offendiculum, quomodo fides Christiana praevaleat scientiae philosophicae? Durandus: Omni, inquit, scienti potest constare de conclusione sua, quod sit vera, & quod impossibile sit aliter se habere. Sed de conclusione deducta ex principiis tantum creditis, non potest constare deducenti, quod impossibile sit, eam aliter se habere, neque quod sit vera. Non enim plus constare potest de conclusione, quam de principiis, cum notitia conclusionum dependeat ex notitia principiorum. Sed respondemus, verbum Dei esse quidem firmissimum fidei principium, sed quod sua habet tekmeria, quae sacra Biblia arguant esse verissimi Dei verum verbum, & quamvis in his ipsis subinde nutet mens humana humano modo agens, tamen Deus eam per id ipsum verbum illuminando & voluntatem in obsequium trahendo, ita firmat certitudinem principii, ut fidelis laeto pectore illud sanguine suo obsignare non dubitet. Principio sic stabilito & immoto, quicquid in eo comprehenditur, pari firmitate creditur, ut sic & principii & conclusionum inde depromptarum infallibilis detur plerophoria. Si enim ita procedatur, ut tekmerion deductioni, qua persuasus homo initio credat, verbum propheticum & Apostolicum, esse verissimi Dei verissimum verbum, conjungatur verbi illius potentia & efficacia, in illuminatione mentis & corroboratione assensus auditoris, perpetuo pendentis a verbo, tum quod alias perpetuo fluctuat, in animis nostris firmissimum sistitur. Et hinc dependet conclusio Richardi de S. Victore, Doctoris solidi dicti: Quotquot veraciter fideles sumus, id est, vera fide, per illuminationem divinam, mediante verbo Dei accensam, donati sumus, nihil certius, nihil constantius tenemus, quam quod fide apprehendimus. Utinam attenderent Judaei, utinam animadverterent pagani, cum quanta conscientiae securitate, ad divinum judicium poterimus accedere. Nonne cum omni fiducia, Deo dicere poterimus: Domine, si error est, a te ipso sumus decepti? Nam ista in nobis, tantis signis & prodigiis confirmata sunt & talibus, quae nonnisi per te fieri possunt, quae & a viris summae sanctitatis nobis sunt tradita, cum summa atque authentica attestatione probata, teipso cooperante sermonem confirmante subsequentibus signis? Notetur hic cooperatio Domini, cum verbo Dei praedicato, praeter externa miracula, sicut Christus Joh. 5.v.20. vivificationem, quam per euangelium praestat, inter opera visibilibus signis majora refert.

About this text

Ludwig Crocius — Book IV Chapter 9 On the forensic law. Cap.10 next De Euangelio.

English follows the locked 1636 Bremen Latin of Liber I Cap. 10, reconstructed from SLUB Dresden page images. Same-page OCR (tesseract lat + Vision) used as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. 11 (CAPUT UNDECIMUM / De S. Theologiae distributione) begins. Cap. 9 complete. Liber I still open. No Internet Archive copy was located.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.